A right to be forgotten A right to be forgotten
  • HOME
  • SERVICES
    • Advice and support
    • How does Google decide when to remove personal data
    • Right to be forgotten legal advice
    • Right to be forgotten preparations
    • Ask the lawyer
    • Delisting
    • Image delisting
    • Videos delisting
    • Articles delisting
    • Speciality
    • Right to be forgotten submission
    • GDPR claim against Google
    • Remove autocomplete from searches
    • Remove news articles from the internet
    • Remove doxxing from the internet
    • Right to be forgotten after not guilty verdicts
    • Can I remove an interview I gave to a newspaper
    • Remove personal information from the internet
    • How to argue proportionality when making a removal of personal information from the internet request
    • The Secret Behind Successful Right to Be Forgotten Requests
  • EXPERTISE
    • Special
    • Challenging cases
    • Complex GDPR notices
    • Right to be forgotten requests
    • Out of date data
    • SHPO and a right to be forgotten
    • Corporate
    • Professional people
    • Disciplinary decisions on Google
    • Company officers
    • Remove autocomplete
    • News articles
    • Google
    • Right to be forgotten Google
    • Defamatory YouTube
    • Google images
    • Social media posts
    • Privacy
    • Breach of privacy
    • Right to be forgotten appeal
    • Criminal convictions
    • GDPR Notice
  • CASES STUDIES
    • Professionals
    • Former models
    • Medical profession case
    • Medical practitioner discipline
    • Financial services case
    • Solicitor discipline case
    • Other niche cases
    • School teacher case
    • Surgeon Court Case
    • Criminal record
    • Criminal appeal case
    • Crime victim case
    • Celebrity case
    • Criminal conviction case
    • Conviction not spent
    • How to remove court records from Google
    • Rehabilitation of Offenders Act
    • No conviction after trial
    • Divorce Case
    • Facebook case
    • Private videos & images
    • Religious belief
    • Twitter case
    • USA citizen case
    • News article
    • Religious belief case
    • A-C
    • D-L
    • M-R
    • S-Z
    • Right to be Forgotten no conviction at trial
    • Right to be forgotten conviction and harassment
    • Harassment and criminal record
    • Removal of links The Courts and Tribunal Service
    • Remove news reports from court case
    • Delete articles from Google after I was found not guilty
    • Will Google delist articles about your professional life
    • Civil legal proceedings
    • Director disqualification
    • Google linked your name to offensive images or videos
    • Google linked your name to offensive images videos or websites- what to do
    • Removing news stories about a domestic dispute
    • How to remove outdated news articles about possession of indecent images
    • People are talking about me online - what to do
    • Right to be forgotten accountants, solicitors and other professionals
    • How to remove your name from fake porn websites
    • Remove from Google links to past in the adult industry
    • Right to be forgotten: Removing a conviction from Google from your teens
    • Removing a spent conviction from Google
    • Get vigilante video deleted from internet
    • Right to be forgotten for witness in a criminal case
    • How to win a right to be forgotten even if Google argue public interest
    • Remove outdated criminal records from Google
    • Remove a serious fraud conviction from Google search
    • Case study of GP who delisted from Google articles about a previous conviction
    • Remove foreign conviction news articles from Google search
    • Right to be forgotten after prison sentence
    • Remove news articles from Google after charges were dropped
    • Wrongly associated with criminal activity on Facebook
    • Deleted content reappearing on Chat GPT and AI search engines
  • ABOUT
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
  • Right to be Forgotten Submissions

It's your right to be Forgotten. Free Call on 0800 612 7211  |  London: 0207 183 4 123

A right to be forgotten A right to be forgotten
  • HOME
  • SERVICES
    • Advice and support
    • How does Google decide when to remove personal data
    • Right to be forgotten legal advice
    • Right to be forgotten preparations
    • Ask the lawyer
    • The Secret Behind Successful Right to Be Forgotten Requests
    • Delisting
    • Image delisting
    • Videos delisting
    • Articles delisting
    • Can I remove an interview I gave to a newspaper
    • Remove personal information from the internet
    • Speciality
    • Right to be forgotten submission
    • GDPR claim against Google
    • Remove autocomplete from searches
    • Remove news articles from the internet
    • Remove doxxing from the internet
    • Right to be forgotten after not guilty verdicts
    • How to argue proportionality when making a removal of personal information from the internet request
  • EXPERTISE
    • Special
    • Challenging cases
    • Complex GDPR notices
    • Right to be forgotten requests
    • Out of date data
    • SHPO and a right to be forgotten
    • Corporate
    • Professional people
    • Disciplinary decisions on Google
    • Company officers
    • Remove autocomplete
    • News articles
    • Google
    • Right to be forgotten Google
    • Defamatory YouTube
    • Google images
    • Social media posts
    • Privacy
    • Breach of privacy
    • Right to be forgotten appeal
    • Criminal convictions
    • GDPR Notice
  • CASES STUDIES

    Professionals

    • Former models
    • Medical profession case
    • Medical practitioner discipline
    • Financial services case
    • Solicitor discipline case
    • School teacher case
    • Surgeon Court Case
    • Right to be Forgotten no conviction at trial
    • Will Google delist articles about your professional life
    • Director disqualification
    • Google linked your name to offensive images or videos
    • Google linked your name to offensive images videos or websites- what to do
    • Right to be forgotten accountants, solicitors and other professionals
    • Case study of GP who delisted from Google articles about a previous conviction

    Criminal record

    • Criminal record
    • Criminal appeal case
    • Crime victim case
    • Criminal conviction case
    • Conviction not spent
    • How to remove court records from Google
    • Rehabilitation of Offenders Act
    • No conviction after trial
    • Right to be Forgotten no conviction at trial
    • Right to be forgotten conviction and harassment
    • Harassment and criminal record
    • Removal of links The Courts and Tribunal Service
    • Remove news reports from court case
    • Delete articles from Google after I was found not guilty
    • Right to be forgotten: Removing a conviction from Google from your teens
    • Removing a spent conviction from Google
    • How to win a right to be forgotten even if Google argue public interest
    • Remove outdated criminal records from Google
    • Remove foreign conviction news articles from Google search
    • Right to be forgotten after prison sentence
    • Remove news articles from Google after charges were dropped

    Other niche cases

    • Former models
    • Celebrity case
    • Divorce Case
    • Facebook case
    • Private videos & images
    • Religious belief
    • Twitter case
    • USA citizen case
    • News article
    • Religious belief case
    • Civil legal proceedings
    • Google linked your name to offensive images or videos
    • Removing news stories about a domestic dispute
    • How to remove your name from fake porn websites
    • Remove from Google links to past in the adult industry
  • ABOUT
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
  • Right to be Forgotten Submissions

Remove Images and Videos – Expert Assessment

Remove Images and Videos from Google | Free Expert Assessment | Cohen Davis
If an intimate image or video has been shared without your consent, call us immediately: 0800 612 7211. We treat these cases as urgent.

Remove Images and Videos from Google – Free Expert Assessment

Finding an image or video of yourself in Google search results — whether it is an intimate photograph, a mugshot, an old press picture, a deepfake or a video posted without your consent — is among the most distressing experiences you can face online. The visual nature of this content makes it uniquely harmful: it is immediate, it is shocking, and it can cause severe damage to your reputation, your relationships, your employment and your mental wellbeing. Cohen Davis Solicitors specialise in removing images and videos from Google, and we treat every case with the urgency, sensitivity and legal expertise it requires.

We act in cases involving personal photographs indexed in Google Images, mugshots and arrest photos that continue to circulate years after a matter has resolved, intimate images shared without consent, deepfakes and AI-generated images, YouTube videos appearing in Google search results, social media video content on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and X, paparazzi or press photographs published without your authorisation, images from old news articles, and screenshot or thumbnail images appearing in Google's search interface. Whatever type of image or video is causing you harm, we will assess your situation and advise you honestly on your removal options.

Where cases involve intimate images — including photographs or videos of a sexual nature that have been shared without consent — we are aware that speed is critical. The sharing of intimate images without consent is a specific criminal offence under UK law, and both Google and the platforms hosting the content have legal obligations that our solicitors know how to enforce rapidly. We handle these cases with complete confidentiality and with the urgency the situation demands.

Every communication you have with us is protected by legal professional privilege from the first moment of contact. Your situation is confidential. Call us on 0800 612 7211 or complete the form below to request your free 15-minute expert assessment with a specialist solicitor today.

SRA Regulated Solicitors Intimate Image Removal Specialists 1,000+ Pages Removed Practising Since 2008 Google Images & YouTube Experts Legal Professional Privilege Deepfake & AI Image Removal Free 15-Min Expert Assessment

Find out whether your images or videos can be removed from Google — speak to a specialist solicitor today.

Request Your Free Expert Assessment

Urgent cases: call us free now: 0800 612 7211

Proven Results: Images, Videos and Search Results We Have Removed

Our solicitors have successfully removed images, videos and associated search results in cases ranging from large-scale Google delisting campaigns to urgent intimate image removal and regulatory ICO proceedings. Our track record spans the full breadth of visual content removal.

1,017 Google pages removed for Chris — including images, news articles and indexed content across multiple domains. One of the largest single-client removal campaigns we have completed.
579 Results removed for HZ, California — demonstrating that our image and video removal expertise extends to international cases, with delisting achieved across Google's global index.
28 + ICO Pages removed for Diego including a successful ICO case — illustrating that where Google or websites refuse to cooperate, we pursue regulatory routes and win.

These results demonstrate what is possible with specialist solicitor-led representation. We cannot guarantee identical outcomes — each case is different — but we will give you a candid expert view on your realistic options at the outset.

About Cohen Davis Solicitors

Yair Cohen – Internet Law Solicitor, Cohen Davis

Cohen Davis Solicitors is one of the UK's leading specialist internet law firms. The firm is founded and led by Yair Cohen, a solicitor who has practised exclusively in internet law since 2008 and is widely recognised as a pioneer of the right to be forgotten in the United Kingdom. Yair Cohen has represented clients in some of the most significant online reputation cases in UK legal history.

The firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). This means every client has the full protection of the solicitor-client relationship — including legal professional privilege from first contact, strict confidentiality obligations, and recourse to the SRA's professional conduct standards. When you share sensitive personal information with us about images or videos that concern you, you do so under the strongest available legal protection.

We handle image and video removal cases across a wide range of situations: intimate images shared without consent (including those covered by the specific criminal offence in UK law), deepfakes and AI-generated imagery, mugshots and arrest photographs, paparazzi and press images, social media content, YouTube videos, and images indexed from news archives. We handle each case with complete sensitivity and discretion.

Our clients include private individuals, professionals, public figures and businesses from across the UK, the United States, Europe and beyond. Unlike non-legal reputation management services, as solicitors we can bring legal proceedings, issue formal notices, engage with the ICO and apply to court — authority that is often decisive in image and video removal cases.

We handle image and video removal cases with speed, sensitivity and full legal authority. Get expert advice today.

Request Your Free Expert Assessment

"I am absolutely delighted about the outcome. The image was removed faster than I thought possible and the team handled everything with total discretion."

Right to be forgotten client

"Thank you Yair for an excellent service. The matter was handled with great sensitivity and the result was everything I had hoped for."

Elliot Crego

What Images and Videos Can Be Removed from Google?

Our solicitors assess image and video removal cases across every category of visual content. Below are the main types of image and video content we work to remove from Google, along with the specific legal frameworks and strategies applicable to each.

Personal Photographs in Google Images

Personal photographs — whether sourced from social media, websites, data aggregators or news archives — that are indexed in Google Images. UK GDPR, the right to erasure and copyright law may all provide grounds for removal depending on the circumstances of publication.

Mugshots and Arrest Photographs

Mugshot websites and local news archives regularly publish arrest photographs that remain indexed on Google for years, often long after a matter has resolved or a conviction is spent. These are among the most commonly removed categories under the right to be forgotten.

Intimate Images Without Consent

The sharing of intimate images without consent is a specific criminal offence under the Online Safety Act 2023 and earlier legislation. We treat these cases as urgent. We pursue removal from both Google's index and the hosting platform, engaging platform abuse and legal enforcement channels simultaneously.

Deepfakes and AI-Generated Images

Artificially generated or manipulated images — including deepfakes placing your likeness in sexual or harmful contexts — are increasingly common and increasingly damaging. Both the creation and sharing of intimate deepfakes are now criminal offences in the UK. We pursue urgent removal through all available legal channels.

YouTube Videos

YouTube videos that appear in Google Search results can be removed through a combination of YouTube's own enforcement processes, DMCA copyright claims, privacy reporting, and — where these fail — formal legal notice. As solicitors, our formal legal notices to Google and YouTube carry authority that individual requests do not.

Social Media Video Content

Videos posted on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X (Twitter) and other social platforms that appear in Google search results. We can pursue removal from the hosting platform under their terms of service, UK law, or both — and separately pursue Google delisting of the indexed result.

Images Embedded in News Articles

Photographs published as part of news articles — whether in a tabloid, local newspaper or online news outlet — that continue to appear in Google Images. The right to be forgotten and, in some cases, defamation or privacy law provide grounds for removal of the indexed image even where the article itself remains published.

Paparazzi and Press Photographs

Photographs taken and published without your consent — including paparazzi shots, press photographs from public events, and images taken in contexts where you had a reasonable expectation of privacy. Privacy law and, where appropriate, copyright law (if you own rights in the image) provide grounds for removal.

Screenshots

Screenshots of social media posts, private messages or other content that has been published online and indexed by Google. Depending on the nature of the screenshotted content, grounds for removal may include data protection law, copyright, defamation or harassment law.

Thumbnail Images in Google Search

Even where a video or article has been removed from its source, a cached thumbnail image may continue to appear in Google Search. We include thumbnail removal as part of comprehensive Google image delisting, ensuring no visual trace of the original content remains in Google's index.

Do Any of These Situations Apply to You?

If you recognise your situation in any of the scenarios below, we can help. Request your free expert assessment to find out what your options are.

An intimate image or video has been shared without your consent

This is an urgent situation. The non-consensual sharing of intimate images is a criminal offence under UK law. We treat these cases as our highest priority, pursuing immediate removal from both the hosting platform and Google's index simultaneously. Do not wait — call us now on 0800 612 7211.

A mugshot or arrest photo appears in Google Images

Arrest photographs published by police forces, local news outlets or dedicated mugshot websites can remain indexed in Google Images for years. We have extensive experience removing mugshots and arrest photos — including for convictions that are spent under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act and for matters that were never prosecuted.

An old photograph from a news article still appears when you search your name

A photograph published alongside a news article — perhaps years ago — continues to appear in Google Images even though the underlying matter has long since resolved. The right to be forgotten and privacy law may provide grounds for removing the image from Google's index even where the article itself has not been removed.

A YouTube video about you is appearing in Google results

A video on YouTube — whether posted by someone who wishes you harm, an old press clip, or content that was once harmless but is now damaging in context — appears in Google's search results when someone searches your name. We handle YouTube removal cases using a combination of Google's own processes and formal legal authority.

A deepfake or AI-generated image of you is indexed

An artificially generated image — including images created using AI tools to place your likeness in false or sexual contexts — has been published online and indexed by Google. Both the creation of intimate deepfakes and their sharing are now criminal offences in the UK. We pursue urgent removal through all available legal channels.

Social media images posted by others appear when someone searches your name

Images posted by other people on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X or another platform — whether tagging you or simply showing you — are indexed in Google Images and appearing when your name is searched. Depending on the image and how it was obtained, UK GDPR, privacy law or the platform's own terms may provide grounds for removal.

Paparazzi or press photographs published without your consent

Photographs taken and published without your authorisation — including paparazzi shots, images taken at events, or photographs published by press outlets in circumstances where you had a reasonable expectation of privacy — appear in Google Images. Privacy law and, in appropriate cases, copyright law provide routes to removal.

Images from a professional context that are damaging in a personal one

Photographs taken in a professional setting — a conference, a court appearance, a company profile — that are now appearing in personal searches and creating a misleading or harmful impression. These cases may be addressed through UK GDPR requests, defamation arguments (where the image creates a false impression) or direct engagement with the source.

Why We Succeed Where Others Fail at Image and Video Removal

Image and video removal from Google is more complex than it may appear. Platforms have incentives to resist removal, legal frameworks are nuanced, and the self-service tools available to individuals are inadequate for most cases. Here is why solicitor-led representation produces substantially better results:

  • Legal authority that commands attention. A formal legal notice from a solicitor — citing specific statutory provisions, naming the applicable grounds for removal, and indicating the legal consequences of non-compliance — produces a fundamentally different response from Google, YouTube and website operators than an individual's request.
  • Specialist knowledge of intimate image law. The law on intimate images has developed significantly in recent years, particularly through the Online Safety Act 2023 and the criminal offences it created. Our solicitors understand these provisions and use them effectively in urgent removal cases.
  • Deepfake and AI image expertise. The law on AI-generated imagery is evolving rapidly. Our solicitors stay current with developments in this area and can deploy both the emerging legal framework and the platform-level reporting processes most likely to achieve urgent removal.
  • Dual-track removal strategy. We pursue both Google delisting and removal from the source platform simultaneously. Removing an image only from Google's index does not remove it from the hosting website — and does not prevent re-indexing. We pursue both tracks to achieve comprehensive, durable results.
  • ICO route where platforms resist. Where a platform refuses to remove content that constitutes a breach of data protection law, we can bring formal complaints and proceedings before the Information Commissioner's Office. This regulatory route — which we have used successfully, as in Diego's case — is often decisive.
  • Speed in urgent cases. For intimate images and other urgent matters, we move quickly. We understand that every hour that content remains indexed and accessible causes additional harm, and we structure our approach accordingly.
  • Confidentiality and legal privilege. Everything you tell us about the images or videos you want removed is protected by legal professional privilege. Our obligation of confidentiality is absolute. Many clients in image removal cases are concerned about who may become aware of the situation — with us, that concern is addressed from the outset.

Let our specialist solicitors assess your image or video removal case — free, confidential, no obligation.

Request Your Free Expert Assessment

Urgent cases call free now: 0800 612 7211

Why Use a Solicitor — Not a Reputation Agency — for Image and Video Removal?

Image and video removal cases — particularly those involving intimate images, deepfakes, or content on resistant platforms — require legal authority that non-legal services simply do not have. The table below explains the critical differences.

Capability Cohen Davis Solicitors Typical Agency / DIY
Can issue formal legal removal notices under UK law Yes No
Knowledge of intimate image offences under Online Safety Act 2023 Yes No
Communications protected by legal professional privilege Yes — from first contact No
Can bring ICO proceedings for data protection breaches Yes No
Can apply to court for urgent injunctions Yes No
SRA regulated — strict professional conduct standards Yes No
Pursues both Google delisting and source platform removal Yes — dual track Typically delisting only
Expertise in deepfake and AI-generated image removal Yes Unlikely
Handles YouTube and social media platform takedowns legally Yes Reporting tools only
Free expert assessment before committing to any fees Yes — 15 minutes free Varies

Image and video removal requires specialist legal expertise. Speak to a solicitor — not a call centre.

Request Your Free Expert Assessment

"Giving my family… you have given us our lives back. I cannot thank you enough for what you have done for us."

Eric — 3 pages removed from Google

"Exceptionally professional and swift. The matter was handled with complete discretion and resolved faster than I anticipated."

Ms J.J — New York

Frequently Asked Questions

Removing Images and Videos from Google

Can images be removed from Google search results?
Yes — images appearing in Google Images and as visual results in Google Search can be removed from Google's index. The grounds for removal depend on the nature of the image and the circumstances of publication. Common grounds include the UK GDPR right to erasure, privacy law, defamation law where the image creates a false impression, and the specific legal frameworks that apply to intimate images and deepfakes. Our solicitors will assess your specific images and advise you on the strongest available grounds and realistic prospects.
Can intimate images be removed from Google urgently?
Yes — and we treat these cases as urgent. The non-consensual sharing of intimate images is a criminal offence under UK law (the Online Safety Act 2023 and earlier provisions), and both Google and the platforms hosting such images have legal obligations to act on reports. We pursue simultaneous removal from Google's index and from the hosting platform, using our legal authority to enforce rapid compliance. If you are in this situation, please call us now on 0800 612 7211 rather than waiting to complete a form.
What is the process for removing a YouTube video from Google?
YouTube videos appear prominently in Google Search results, and removing them requires action at both the YouTube level and the Google index level. We pursue YouTube removal through YouTube's content reporting and legal enforcement processes — including privacy removal requests, harassment reports, and formal legal notices issued under UK law. Where YouTube's automated systems refuse removal, our solicitors can escalate through formal legal channels. Once the video is removed from YouTube, we also ensure the cached Google result is purged from Google's index.
Can deepfake images be removed from Google?
Yes. The creation and sharing of intimate deepfakes — AI-generated images placing someone's likeness in sexual contexts — is now a criminal offence in the UK following the Online Safety Act 2023 and subsequent legislation. Separately, UK GDPR and privacy law provide additional grounds for removal. We pursue removal of deepfakes as a matter of urgency, engaging both the hosting platforms and Google's legal teams. Even where images are on obscure or overseas platforms, Google delisting can be achieved independently of the source platform's cooperation in many cases.
What if the image is on someone else's website?
The fact that an image is on a third-party website does not prevent removal from Google. Our approach is dual-track: we pursue both delisting from Google's index (which removes the image from Google search results regardless of what the source website does) and removal from the source website. For the source website, we issue formal legal notices citing the applicable legal basis — UK GDPR, privacy law, defamation law, or the specific legislation on intimate images and deepfakes — and, where the website operator does not comply, we can pursue ICO proceedings or court action as appropriate.
Can old photographs from newspaper articles be removed from Google Images?
In many cases, yes. Photographs published alongside news articles — particularly those relating to historical matters, spent convictions, or events where the balance between public interest and your privacy has shifted over time — can be delisted from Google Images under the right to be forgotten. This can often be achieved independently of whether the article itself is delisted; the image can be removed from Google's image index even where the article text remains accessible. Our solicitors will assess the specific photographs and advise on the applicable grounds.
Does Google have a specific process for image removal?
Yes. Google has specific removal tools for certain categories of image — including intimate images, images of minors, and certain categories of personal information visible in images. However, these tools are limited in scope and Google refuses many requests submitted without legal support. For images falling outside Google's specific tools, or where a Google tool request has been refused, solicitor-led removal using formal legal frameworks is substantially more effective. We will identify the most appropriate route for your specific images during the free assessment.
Can social media images be removed from Google even if the post is still live?
Yes — it is possible to delist a social media image from Google's index even if the original social media post remains published. Google's index of social media content is subject to the same right to be forgotten and UK GDPR frameworks as any other indexed content. A successful delisting request means the image will no longer appear in Google Images or Google Search, even if someone who knows the direct URL of the social media post could still view it there. We pursue this where source deletion from the social platform is not achievable or where you want immediate removal from Google's results.

About the Free Expert Assessment

What happens during the free expert assessment?
You will speak with a qualified solicitor who specialises in internet law, image removal and Google search result removal. The assessment lasts approximately 15 minutes. The solicitor will review the images or videos you want removed, identify the applicable legal frameworks — including data protection law, privacy law, intimate image legislation and defamation law as relevant — and give you an honest assessment of your options and realistic prospects. There is no charge and no obligation to instruct us.
Is everything I tell you completely confidential?
Yes — absolutely. Everything you disclose to us about your situation, including the nature of the images or videos concerned, is protected by legal professional privilege from the moment of first contact. This is a legal protection, not merely a policy commitment. Your communications with us cannot be disclosed without your consent, even in legal proceedings. Many clients in image removal cases — particularly those involving intimate images — are understandably anxious about confidentiality, and we want you to know that the protection is complete and legally enforceable.
What information should I have ready for the assessment?
It is helpful to have the URLs of the images or videos you want removed, the search terms that produce the visual results (typically your name), and a brief note of the background — how the image came to be published and why you want it removed. For intimate image cases, please do not feel you need to share more detail than you are comfortable with; the solicitor will guide you sensitively. You do not need to have everything organised before calling — our solicitors are experienced at working with clients who are distressed and in an urgent situation.
What are the fees for image and video removal?
Our fees depend on the nature and number of images or videos, the platforms involved, the legal strategy required, and whether the matter is contested. We will provide you with a clear written fee estimate during or after your free assessment, before any work begins. The assessment itself is entirely free of charge. For urgent intimate image cases, we will prioritise your assessment and discuss fee options that reflect the urgency of your situation.

Ready to find out whether your images or videos can be removed from Google? Book your free expert assessment now.

Request Your Free Expert Assessment

Urgent? Call free immediately: 0800 612 7211

What Our Clients Say

Our clients come to us in some of the most sensitive and distressing situations imaginable. We are proud of both the results we achieve and the way we handle each case. Here is what some of our clients have said.

★★★★★
"An extraordinary result — 1,017 pages successfully removed from Google. I never thought this was possible. Cohen Davis delivered beyond anything I expected."
Chris — 1,017 pages removed from Google
★★★★★
"579 pages removed and I am based in California. The team worked across jurisdictions without any issue. Highly professional throughout."
HZ — 579 pages removed, California
★★★★★
"28 pages removed and a successful ICO case. They pursued every avenue available and achieved a result I did not think was possible."
Diego — 28 pages removed, ICO case won
★★★★★
"Giving my family… you have given us our lives back. I cannot thank you enough for what you have done for us."
Eric — 3 pages removed from Google
★★★★★
"Excellent solicitors, very professional. They dealt with my case efficiently and I now have 13 pages removed from Google."
Martin — 13 pages removed from Google
★★★★★
"This is the fourth time I have used Cohen Davis for different situations. I return because they consistently deliver."
Thomas — 4 pages removed, repeat client
★★★★★
"Based in New York and they handled everything remotely without any difficulty. Efficient and very effective."
Edwin — New York, 2 pages removed
★★★★★
"Exceptionally professional and swift. The matter was handled with complete discretion and resolved faster than I anticipated."
Ms J.J — New York
★★★★★
"My future happiness depended on the work of this company. I am pleased to say the outcome exceeded my expectations."
Mr B.G — Nottingham
★★★★★
"The result has been fantastic. I would recommend Cohen Davis to anyone dealing with images they want removed from Google."
Dr B.Y — Bradford
★★★★★
"Very pleased with the services provided. Knowledgeable, responsive and effective — exactly what I needed."
Mr E.P — Jersey
★★★★★
"Fantastic team of internet lawyers — incredibly helpful, robust and hugely knowledgeable. I could not have asked for better."
David Baum
★★★★★
"Your team and professional services are excellent. From the first call to the final result, I felt fully supported."
Mrs S.L
★★★★★
"I am absolutely delighted about the outcome. The content was removed and I can move forward with my life."
Right to be forgotten client
★★★★★
"Refreshingly — for a lawyer — Yair Cohen advised me not to hire him in this instance. That honesty made me trust them completely when I did instruct them later."
Honest Advice Review

How the Process Works

Removing images and videos from Google with Cohen Davis Solicitors follows a clear three-stage process. For urgent cases — particularly intimate images — we accelerate each stage.

1

Free Expert Assessment

You request a free 15-minute consultation. A specialist solicitor reviews the images or videos at issue, identifies the applicable legal grounds — data protection, privacy, intimate image law, defamation or other — and gives you an honest assessment of your options and realistic prospects at no charge and with no obligation.

2

Strategy & Instruction

If we believe we can help and you instruct us, we develop a tailored strategy for your case. This will address both Google delisting and source platform removal where achievable, identify the strongest legal grounds, and include a clear fee agreement before any work begins.

3

Removal & Confirmation

We engage Google, the hosting platforms, website operators and the ICO as required, using our full legal authority to achieve removal. We keep you informed at every stage and confirm once the images or videos have been successfully removed from Google's index and, where achieved, from the source.

Our Fees

The initial 15-minute expert assessment is completely free of charge. There is no obligation to instruct us and no cost associated with the consultation itself.

If you instruct us, our fees depend on the nature and number of images or videos to be removed, the platforms involved, the legal strategy required, and whether the matter is contested by the hosting platform or website operator. We will provide you with a clear written fee estimate before any work begins.

For straightforward image delisting cases we typically offer fixed-fee arrangements. For more complex cases — including those involving multiple platforms, contested removal, ICO proceedings or court action — we offer hourly rate arrangements. We will always explain your fee options clearly and in writing before committing to any work.

For urgent intimate image cases, we understand that cost should not be a barrier to seeking help. We will discuss your specific situation and the options available — including the possibility of interim steps at reduced cost — during your assessment.

The first step — your free expert assessment — costs nothing. Request it today.

Request Your Free Expert Assessment

Complete the form below and a specialist solicitor will contact you to discuss removing your images or videos from Google. All enquiries are confidential and protected by legal professional privilege from the first contact.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Your information is treated with complete confidentiality and protected by legal professional privilege. We will never share your details with third parties. By submitting this form you agree to us contacting you to discuss your enquiry.

Urgent? Please call us directly on 0800 612 7211 — we treat intimate image cases as our highest priority.

MORE INFORMATION

  • Rates and funding
  • Case studies
  • Contact
  • About us
  • Blog

Right to be Forgotten Solicitors

We are the only law firm in the UK with a dedicated team that specialises exclusively in making successful Right to be Forgotten applications.

Call Free on 0800 612 7211

Email Us

Privacy Policy. 2020 © A Right to be Forgotten. All rights reserved