A right to be forgotten A right to be forgotten
  • HOME
  • SERVICES
    • Advice and support
    • How does Google decide when to remove personal data
    • Right to be forgotten legal advice
    • Right to be forgotten preparations
    • Ask the lawyer
    • Delisting
    • Image delisting
    • Videos delisting
    • Articles delisting
    • Speciality
    • Right to be forgotten submission
    • GDPR claim against Google
    • Remove autocomplete from searches
    • Remove news articles from the internet
    • Remove doxxing from the internet
    • Right to be forgotten after not guilty verdicts
    • Can I remove an interview I gave to a newspaper
    • Remove personal information from the internet
    • How to argue proportionality when making a removal of personal information from the internet request
    • The Secret Behind Successful Right to Be Forgotten Requests
  • EXPERTISE
    • Special
    • Challenging cases
    • Complex GDPR notices
    • Right to be forgotten requests
    • Out of date data
    • SHPO and a right to be forgotten
    • Corporate
    • Professional people
    • Disciplinary decisions on Google
    • Company officers
    • Remove autocomplete
    • News articles
    • Google
    • Right to be forgotten Google
    • Defamatory YouTube
    • Google images
    • Social media posts
    • Privacy
    • Breach of privacy
    • Right to be forgotten appeal
    • Criminal convictions
    • GDPR Notice
  • CASES STUDIES
    • Professionals
    • Former models
    • Medical profession case
    • Medical practitioner discipline
    • Financial services case
    • Solicitor discipline case
    • Other niche cases
    • School teacher case
    • Surgeon Court Case
    • Criminal record
    • Criminal appeal case
    • Crime victim case
    • Celebrity case
    • Criminal conviction case
    • Conviction not spent
    • How to remove court records from Google
    • Rehabilitation of Offenders Act
    • No conviction after trial
    • Divorce Case
    • Facebook case
    • Private videos & images
    • Religious belief
    • Twitter case
    • USA citizen case
    • News article
    • Religious belief case
    • A-C
    • D-L
    • M-R
    • S-Z
    • Right to be Forgotten no conviction at trial
    • Right to be forgotten conviction and harassment
    • Harassment and criminal record
    • Removal of links The Courts and Tribunal Service
    • Remove news reports from court case
    • Delete articles from Google after I was found not guilty
    • Will Google delist articles about your professional life
    • Civil legal proceedings
    • Director disqualification
    • Google linked your name to offensive images or videos
    • Google linked your name to offensive images videos or websites- what to do
    • Removing news stories about a domestic dispute
    • How to remove outdated news articles about possession of indecent images
    • People are talking about me online - what to do
    • Right to be forgotten accountants, solicitors and other professionals
    • How to remove your name from fake porn websites
    • Remove from Google links to past in the adult industry
    • Right to be forgotten: Removing a conviction from Google from your teens
    • Removing a spent conviction from Google
    • Get vigilante video deleted from internet
    • Right to be forgotten for witness in a criminal case
    • How to win a right to be forgotten even if Google argue public interest
    • Remove outdated criminal records from Google
    • Remove a serious fraud conviction from Google search
    • Case study of GP who delisted from Google articles about a previous conviction
    • Remove foreign conviction news articles from Google search
    • Right to be forgotten after prison sentence
    • Remove news articles from Google after charges were dropped
    • Wrongly associated with criminal activity on Facebook
    • Deleted content reappearing on Chat GPT and AI search engines
  • ABOUT
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
  • Right to be Forgotten Submissions
  • FREE ASSESSMENT

It's your right to be Forgotten. Free Call on 0800 612 7211  |  London: 0207 183 4 123

A right to be forgotten A right to be forgotten
  • HOME
  • SERVICES
    • Advice and support
    • How does Google decide when to remove personal data
    • Right to be forgotten legal advice
    • Right to be forgotten preparations
    • Ask the lawyer
    • The Secret Behind Successful Right to Be Forgotten Requests
    • Delisting
    • Image delisting
    • Videos delisting
    • Articles delisting
    • Can I remove an interview I gave to a newspaper
    • Remove personal information from the internet
    • Speciality
    • Right to be forgotten submission
    • GDPR claim against Google
    • Remove autocomplete from searches
    • Remove news articles from the internet
    • Remove doxxing from the internet
    • Right to be forgotten after not guilty verdicts
    • How to argue proportionality when making a removal of personal information from the internet request
  • EXPERTISE
    • Special
    • Challenging cases
    • Complex GDPR notices
    • Right to be forgotten requests
    • Out of date data
    • SHPO and a right to be forgotten
    • Corporate
    • Professional people
    • Disciplinary decisions on Google
    • Company officers
    • Remove autocomplete
    • News articles
    • Google
    • Right to be forgotten Google
    • Defamatory YouTube
    • Google images
    • Social media posts
    • Privacy
    • Breach of privacy
    • Right to be forgotten appeal
    • Criminal convictions
    • GDPR Notice
  • CASES STUDIES

    Professionals

    • Former models
    • Medical profession case
    • Medical practitioner discipline
    • Financial services case
    • Solicitor discipline case
    • School teacher case
    • Surgeon Court Case
    • Right to be Forgotten no conviction at trial
    • Will Google delist articles about your professional life
    • Director disqualification
    • Google linked your name to offensive images or videos
    • Google linked your name to offensive images videos or websites- what to do
    • Right to be forgotten accountants, solicitors and other professionals
    • Case study of GP who delisted from Google articles about a previous conviction

    Criminal record

    • Criminal record
    • Criminal appeal case
    • Crime victim case
    • Criminal conviction case
    • Conviction not spent
    • How to remove court records from Google
    • Rehabilitation of Offenders Act
    • No conviction after trial
    • Right to be Forgotten no conviction at trial
    • Right to be forgotten conviction and harassment
    • Harassment and criminal record
    • Removal of links The Courts and Tribunal Service
    • Remove news reports from court case
    • Delete articles from Google after I was found not guilty
    • Right to be forgotten: Removing a conviction from Google from your teens
    • Removing a spent conviction from Google
    • How to win a right to be forgotten even if Google argue public interest
    • Remove outdated criminal records from Google
    • Remove foreign conviction news articles from Google search
    • Right to be forgotten after prison sentence
    • Remove news articles from Google after charges were dropped

    Other niche cases

    • Former models
    • Celebrity case
    • Divorce Case
    • Facebook case
    • Private videos & images
    • Religious belief
    • Twitter case
    • USA citizen case
    • News article
    • Religious belief case
    • Civil legal proceedings
    • Google linked your name to offensive images or videos
    • Removing news stories about a domestic dispute
    • How to remove your name from fake porn websites
    • Remove from Google links to past in the adult industry
  • ABOUT
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
  • Right to be Forgotten Submissions
  • FREE ASSESSMENT

Book Your Free Expert Assessment

You're in the right place

When you call us, you will know almost immediately that you have arrived at the right place. This is what we have been doing for over 25 years. We are an award-winning law firm, recognised specifically for this type of work, and we have removed online content for solicitors, accountants, doctors, professionals on the Sunday Times Rich List, business owners, public figures, and people from every imaginable industry and walk of life.

Our real expertise is in the tough, stubborn cases – the ones other firms have turned away, the ones the removal companies have failed on, the ones where the publisher has already said no.

Where others have already given up, we've just got started.

You will be able to speak freely and openly about your situation, and we will immediately understand it. Regardless of how personal, serious or embarrassing it may feel for you, we will never judge you.

Request your free Expert Assessment

What we've achieved for clients like you

Hard numbers, not marketing claims:

  • 1,017 pages removed in a single case (client: Chris)
  • 579 pages removed for a California-based client (client: HZ)
  • ICO cases won against Google – including cases where the ICO accepted "most if not all of the very cogent arguments"
  • Cases handled from the UK, the United States, Canada, Australia and across the EU
  • Law Society Excellence Awards – 2016 Winner, 2019 Shortlisted

Who we are

Yair Cohen, specialist internet law solicitor

We are Cohen Davis Solicitors, trading through the Internet Law Centre. We are the only law firm in the UK with a dedicated Internet Law and Right to be Forgotten team. The team is led by Yair Cohen, a specialist internet law solicitor with over 25 years' experience in online reputation, defamation, and data protection law.

Because we have been doing this work for so long, we know many of the people on the other side of these matters – in-house counsel at the platforms, newspaper editors and their legal teams, the solicitors who act for Google and the major publishers. Those relationships are built on mutual respect, and they matter. A well-pitched letter from a firm the other side knows and trusts is often the difference between a two-week removal and a two-year fight.

We are solicitor-led and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. That matters: it means legal professional privilege, a formal duty of care, and the ability to escalate – to the ICO, to Google, and into court – when that is the right thing for the client.

 
[Yair's 60–90 second video – to be embedded here once recorded]

The kinds of cases we handle

We have removed thousands of pages over the years. Whatever your situation is, the likelihood is that we have already dealt with one very similar to it.

News articles and press coverage

We have secured removals or de-indexing involving effectively every major UK national and regional title, including The Sun, The Daily Mail, The Mirror, The Times, The Telegraph, The Guardian, The Express, The Independent, the Evening Standard, Metro, the BBC, ITV, Sky News, local Reach and Newsquest titles, trade press and professional journals.

Other content types

  • Criminal convictions – spent, unspent, not guilty verdicts, discontinued proceedings, foreign convictions
  • Professional discipline matters – doctors, solicitors, accountants, teachers, financial services professionals, regulated tradespeople
  • Social media content – Facebook, X, Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, Reddit, forums
  • YouTube videos, Google autocomplete and "People also ask" suggestions
  • Images and photographs, including intimate images and deepfakes
  • Doxxing and exposure of private information
  • Civil proceedings, court reporting, divorce and family matters
  • ICO complaints, appeals and strategic escalation

Content outside the UK

We act for clients internationally. We have handled cases against content and publishers based in the United States, Canada, Australia, across the EU, and in other jurisdictions. Cross-border matters – different legal tests, different platforms, different escalation routes – are part of our day-to-day work.

If your situation isn't on this list, it doesn't mean we can't help. Tell us about it in the assessment form below.

Why a solicitor, not a content removal company

  Internet law solicitor Content removal company
SRA regulated Yes No
Legal professional privilege Yes No
Strategic advice on the right route for your specific case Yes No
Legal leverage – ability to credibly threaten and pursue proceedings Yes No
Expert ICO strategy – knows when and how to use it (and when not to) Yes No
Able to issue legal proceedings Yes No
Professional contacts with major attorneys and in-house counsel in the US and Canada Yes No
Experience with complex, multi-jurisdictional cases Yes Limited
Fixed fees quoted in writing before work starts Yes Varies

A removal company can send take-down requests. A solicitor can do that, and escalate when the first attempt fails – which, in the cases that actually matter, it usually does.

Strategic thinking is the difference

Most Right to be Forgotten cases are not won by legal templates. They are won by strategic thinking – reading the specific facts, the publisher, the jurisdiction, the regulatory climate, the commercial pressures on the other side – and then thinking outside the box to find the angle others missed.

That is what 25 years of doing this work gives you. It is not just knowing the law. It is knowing which argument to put, to which person, at which moment, in which order. It is knowing when a polite letter works and when it won't – and what to do next when it doesn't. It is knowing when the ICO is the right route and when it will actively hurt your case. It is knowing which journalist or editor to approach directly, and which to go around.

The cases we are proudest of are the ones that looked impossible on paper and were solved by an unexpected route.

What clients say

"Your assistance and guidance is far beyond the value of any fees paid."

Chris – 1,017 pages removed

"Giving my family, in particular my sons, a more stress free normal life… you have given us our lives back."

Eric – 3 pages removed

The ICO accepted "most if not all of the very cogent arguments" we put forward.

Diego – 28 pages removed, ICO case won

"Excellent solicitors, very professional and delivered wonderful results."

Martin – 13 pages removed

"Excellent, professional service delivered within a tight timeline. Have used twice and will use again."

Thomas – 4 pages, repeat client

"I hope never to need their services again but I would recommend them without hesitation."

Edwin, New York – 2 pages

"I have found your fantastic team of internet lawyers incredibly helpful, robust and hugely knowledgeable. You are certainly a safe pair of hands to be in during difficult times."

David Baum

"Refreshingly – for a lawyer – Yair Cohen advised me not to hire him in this instance as it would not be a good investment of time and money."

Honest advice – we tell you if we cannot help

How it works – three steps

1

Free 15-minute Expert Assessment

A qualified and highly experienced solicitor reviews your situation and classifies the case – straightforward, complex, or ineligible. No sales pitch.

2

Written Case Review and Fixed-Fee Quote

Within 48 hours, you receive a written review and a fixed-fee quote. Quote valid for 14 days. You decide.

3

We act – and we win

If you instruct us, we begin work immediately. You have a named solicitor, clear communication, and a legal team behind every step.

We are results focused. We do not give up. If the first route fails, we find the next one.

What it costs

  • Standard cases – from £1,000 + VAT, fixed fee quoted in writing
  • Complex cases – from £5,000 + VAT, scoped and quoted before any work starts
  • The Expert Assessment itself is free. No obligation, no pressure.

You will never be charged for anything you haven't agreed to in writing.

Frequently asked questions

How do I know if my case is eligible?

That is exactly what the free Expert Assessment is for. A solicitor reviews the URLs and facts, applies the legal tests under UK GDPR and case law, and tells you honestly whether you have a case.

How quickly can content be removed?

It varies enormously. At one end, we have had content taken down within 24 hours where the right argument lands with the right person at the right time. At the other end, the most stubborn cases – old press articles, hostile publishers, foreign content, deeply entrenched search results – can take a couple of years of sustained work. We will give you a realistic expected timeline with the written quote.

What we will tell you is this: we do not give up. If there is even the slightest chance or opportunity to move a case forward, we visit it, revisit it, and look for new angles. We treat the difficult cases as a challenge, not a reason to walk away.

What if Google or the publisher refuses?

A refusal is the start of the real legal work, not the end of it. We escalate – but not necessarily to the ICO. Whether to go to the ICO, issue proceedings in court, pursue the publisher directly, approach a platform's in-house legal team, or combine routes is a strategic decision we make together with you. Sometimes the ICO is the right move. Sometimes it actively hurts the case and filing a claim in court is the better route. Choosing correctly is a large part of what you are paying for.

Why not just submit the RTBF form myself?

You can, and many people do. If the request is simple, it may succeed. If it doesn't, the refusal itself can make later legal action harder, because Google's response becomes part of the record. The Expert Assessment tells you, for free, whether the DIY route is likely to work in your specific case.

Will my details be kept confidential?

Yes. Your enquiry is covered by legal professional privilege from the first call.

Request your free Expert Assessment

Tell us about your situation. A solicitor will call you back within one working day. The call is free, confidential, and carries no obligation.

Your information is treated in strict confidence and protected by solicitor-client privilege. We are regulated by the SRA.

Popular topics

  • A right to be forgotten legal proceedings
  • Right to be forgotten GDPR Notice
  • Right to be forgotten request
  • GDPR notice on website operators
  • Reasons for right to be forgotten
  • GDPR right to be forgotten procedure
  • Right to be forgotten Google
  • Remove an article from Google
  • Right to be forgotten professional people
  • Removing posts from social media
  • Right to be forgotten appeal
  • Remove criminal convictions from Google
  • Remove images from Google
  • Examples of right to be forgotten cases
  • Removing autocomplete
  • Remove reference to a disciplinary decision
  • Learn about right to be forgotten
  • Remove negative videos from YouTube
  • Remove news articles from the internet
  • Remove content from Google
  • Remove items from Google search
  • Right to be Forgotten Submissions

Popular topics

  • A right to be forgotten legal proceedings
  • Right to be forgotten GDPR Notice
  • Right to be forgotten request
  • GDPR notice on website operators
  • Reasons for right to be forgotten
  • GDPR right to be forgotten procedure
  • Right to be forgotten Google
  • Remove an article from Google
  • Right to be forgotten professional people
  • Removing posts from social media
  • Right to be forgotten appeal
  • Remove criminal convictions from Google
  • Remove images from Google
  • Examples of right to be forgotten cases
  • Removing autocomplete
  • Remove reference to a disciplinary decision
  • Learn about right to be forgotten
  • Remove negative videos from YouTube
  • Remove news articles from the internet
  • Remove content from Google
  • Remove items from Google search
  • Right to be Forgotten Submissions

MORE INFORMATION

  • Rates and funding
  • Case studies
  • Contact
  • About us
  • Blog

Right to be Forgotten Solicitors

We are the only law firm in the UK with a dedicated team that specialises exclusively in making successful Right to be Forgotten applications.

Call Free on 0800 612 7211

Email Us

Privacy Policy. 2020 © A Right to be Forgotten. All rights reserved